![]() ![]() When you select one, you’ll be prompted for its password either of the encryption options, as you prefer.Because this is sparse storage, it only occupies the space it needs at the time, so ensure this is healthily large, in GB or even TB the maximum size you want the sparse bundle to grow to.a suitable file name and location for the encrypted sparse bundle, and a name for the mounted volume.This produces quite a busy dialog, into which you should enter: In Disk Utility, make a Blank image using the New Image… command in the File menu. They also only use the space they require. Sparse bundles have the advantage that they store the encrypted contents in chunks or bands, which can minimise the amount of backup space they require as they are modified. I’ll do it here using a sparse bundle, although if you prefer you can use a disk image instead. Setting up an encrypted harbour for your files is straightforward. It’s all done with Disk Utility ( hdiutil if you prefer), and once set up works rather well. It has, but perhaps not in the direct way that you expected. Has Apple not yet got round to implementing this? Do you remember it referring to both whole-disk and individual file and folder encryption? Look as hard as you like in the Finder, its Quick Actions, contextual menus, and so on, and it’s nowhere to be found. As few of us have no documents with sensitive contents, you may still want some to be suitably protected.Ĭast your mind back to when Apple first announced APFS and its wonderful new features. But if your Mac has to perform encryption in software – as it will for any external storage even when it does have a T2 chip – you may not want the whole disk encrypted. If your Mac has a T2 chip, like it or not, your internal storage will be fully encrypted. ![]() Whole disk encryption is far superior in most respects to encrypting individual files and folders.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |